beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for seventeen years.
One knife knife (No. 1) and one knife (No. 2) shall be cut.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Since August 201, the Defendant was a person who is engaged in the business of acting on behalf of the Defendant, and was in an employment relationship with the victim D (n, 38 years of age) who was working in the Gangnam-gu Cda from around 201, and on October 201, the Hague was notified of the Defendant on the ground that the Defendant was excessively imminent from the said D, such as prohibiting the Defendant from working on his/her behalf, etc., on the ground that he/she was unable to work on his/her behalf of the Defendant, etc., he/she threatened with the said D several times on the ground that the said D does not leave his/her own new franchise and going on the vehicle for several hours, and that the said D would stick off with his/her upper part on his/her trees, and that he/she would be cut off without being cut off.
From October 2011, the Defendant: (a) did not move to another room and residence where the victim D had been working for the Defendant from around October 201, and (b) distributed a leaflet where the victim D’s face pictures are attached to the victim D’s face, and (c) the Defendant filed a complaint by confinement, intimidation, etc. around November 201.
Around April 2012, the Defendant received information from an anonymous informant that the victim D works as an employee at the Fda bank in the south-gu, East-gu, Seoul, and sought the above D in Fda to meet the Defendant. However, the above D asked the Defendant to favour to do so, and the Defendant asked the Defendant to do so. Since May 2012, the Defendant sent a letter to the victim D and Favour on several occasions from around 2012, but there was no answer from the above D, and there was no answer from the victim D and Favour on several occasions, and “if you continue to send such a letter, you will report to the police.”
As above, while the Defendant continued to disregard the victim D continuously, and the original network and attachment of D gradually increased, the Defendant sought to spread the victim D to the above FC once again on July 2012. However, D is a multilateral owner.