The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) is that the performance agreement dated July 17, 2004 (hereinafter “instant performance agreement”) entered in the facts constituting the crime as indicated in the judgment of the court below was forged by M. Therefore, the defendant did not dismiss M as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the court below.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the court below comprehensively based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below. ① Victim M is the victim M is the one having the name of N, Real Estate Introduction, P, and Defendant F, etc. from the place where the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court below, to July 2004, to conclude an exchange contract on the real estate in the name of N, the victim's name of N, Real Estate Introduction, and the name of F, the Defendant's child, which was issued on July 12, 2004 from N, in order to enter into an agreement on the exchange of real estate in the name of F, which is the victim's child, at the location of the bank office located in Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, the court below issued N, a seal imprint certificate issued on July 12, 2004, and P signed on July 17, 200 and stated to the purport that "F's seal imprint was affixed to the purchaser column in the draft of the implementation agreement."