logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.02.09 2016나12066
건물명도 등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) evidence submitted by the court of first instance, which is insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion that the defendants occupied the store of this case without permission and caused considerable loss to the business losses due to the plaintiff's failure to operate the real estate brokerage business; and (b) the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the part of the judgment, except for the rejection of each description of evidence No. 23, No. 24, which is insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion

2. As such, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and all appeals against the defendants are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow