logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.01.09 2013노1901
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the bus operated by the defendant is subscribed to the mutual aid association of the National Federation of Bus Transport Business Associations; (b) the defendant agreed with the victims; (c) the defendant was proceeding with the bus at a relatively low speed of 10km; (d) the defendant was faithfully taking measures after the accident, such as aiding the victims after the instant traffic accident; (e) the defendant was led to confession and reflect; (e) the defendant was led to a confession and reflect; and (e) the defendant was retired from the bus company in relation to the instant traffic accident; and (e) the defendant was retired from the bus company.

2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, even if the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant, who is an urban bus driver, in violation of the signal, was committed by the occupational negligence entering the intersection in front of the city bus in front of the signal, and caused injury to the victim D, who had driven the automobile, requiring approximately 3 weeks of treatment and approximately 12 weeks of treatment to the left side of the Defendant’s course due to the occupational negligence entering the intersection in front of the signal, and in violation of the signal, the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant. The traffic signal violation at the intersection is likely to develop due to a serious accident, and thus, the crime of this case cannot be deemed to be somewhat weak, considering the circumstances alleged by the Defendant at the lower court. In full view of all the circumstances such as the character, character and environment of the Defendant, the background and consequence of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions in the records and arguments, the above Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow