beta
Text
1. Promissory notes, No. 615, dated November 2, 2015, issued by the Defendant against the Plaintiff by a notary public against the Plaintiff is a law firm C. 615.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. (1) On May 11, 2015, the Plaintiff, including the preparation of the notarial deed of the first promissory note, issued a promissory note with “amount of KRW 90,000,000,000,000,000,000,” “payment date,” “the Defendant, the Defendant,” and the Plaintiff and the Defendant, as of the same day, have the right to issue and affix seals to the said promissory note, and if the payment of the said note is delayed, a notary public entrusted the preparation of a notarial deed (Evidence 1, 2015 and 231,00,000,000,000,000,0000,000,0000,000,000
(2) On the other hand, on May 15, 2015, the Defendant drafted and delivered a letter of payment (Evidence A2, hereinafter “instant letter of payment”) stating that “if all the amounts are settled, it will pay KRW 20 million” in the Plaintiff’s future.
B. (1) After the Plaintiff’s criminal complaint against the Defendant on June 30, 2015, the Defendant applied for the commencement of an auction on the real estate owned by the Plaintiff based on the notarial deed of the first promissory note as Seoul Southern District Court E, and received a decision to commence an auction on July 1, 2015 from the said court.
(2) Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a criminal charge against the Defendant on the criminal facts, such as “The Plaintiff threatened the Plaintiff, damaged property, and forced the Plaintiff to prepare the notarial deed of the first promissory note of this case by threatening the Plaintiff.”
C. (1) On November 2, 2015, the Plaintiff paid KRW 50 million to the Defendant, and the Defendant on November 2, 2015.
(1) In the auction procedure under subsection (1), a withdrawal of a request for auction was submitted.
In addition, the plaintiff is also the Na.
(2) In the criminal procedure, a statement of withdrawal that the Defendant does not want criminal punishment on the ground that the civil dispute with the Defendant was settled.
(2) On November 2, 2015, the Plaintiff issued a promissory note consisting of “amount of KRW 20 million”, “payment date of KRW 30,000,000” and “the Defendant receiving”.