The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1. Purport of the claim.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this is acceptable as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. On the ground that the number of the electronic tobacco components supplied on January 7, 2015 from the first instance court to the end of the trial proceedings is 50,000,000, the number of the 50,000 units of the judgment of the first instance, 2.5 pages 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the Plaintiff asserted that the number of the electronic tobacco components supplied on January 7, 2015 at the court of first instance to the end of the trial proceedings is 10,000 units.

The Plaintiff stated that 50,00 won of the number of parts supplied on January 7, 2015 through the reference document for the reference of October 12, 2020, which was submitted by the Plaintiff after the closing of the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the trial at the court of first instance, is due to an error by the method of packing and supplying two electronic tobacco in one box, and that the number of parts supplied on the above date is 10,000,000 of the number of electronic tobacco parts supplied by the Plaintiff to the Defendant on January 7, 2015, the Plaintiff shall

In light of such circumstances, the witness G of the first instance court, “50,000”, “80,000”, and “130,000” are based on mistake, and each “10,000” and “130,000,000” are the correct expressions. However, as long as the examination of witness has already been completed, the parts related to the witness testimony in the first instance judgment are not corrected separately

The 2nd judgment of the first instance court is that the 16th judgment "80,000" is "130,000 each," and the same purport is as the 1st judgment.

Each "Witness" of the 19th 2th 2th 19th 17th 3th 17th 17th 2th 2th 3th 3th 2th 3th

The "this Court" of the first instance court shall be deemed to be "the court of the first instance".

The 3rd page 14 of the judgment of the first instance shall be deemed to read "each description and the video of evidence A 17."

In the first instance judgment, 14, 5, 2 and 7, respectively, "......."