1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

The purport of the claim and the appeal shall be 1.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the instant case is as follows, and the Defendant’s assertion added by this court is identical to the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the refusal of the judgment of the court of first instance as to the assertion added by this court as set forth in paragraph (3). Thus, this is acceptable by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. To delete “B.” of Section 15 of the first instance judgment on the part which was written after the dismissal.

Part V of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deducted from 10 conduct in accordance with the 5th conduct of the judgment of the court of first instance.

“ up to” shall be subject to the following:

“The Plaintiff, therefore, has the obligation to pay the Defendant the amount of damages equivalent to KRW 123,089,00 incurred by the Defendant for repair of the instant building and recovery from damage; KRW 102,00,00 ( KRW 500,000 per month x 23 rooms x 500,000 per month x 11 per month x 6 months x 6 months x 6 months) equivalent to the rent that the Plaintiff incurred by the Defendant for repair of the instant building and recovery from damage; KRW 19,695,287 for delay on the total amount of damages between March 1, 2019 and December 7, 2020; KRW 1239,000,000 per year; KRW 1084,00 per year x 2844,00 per year x 7444,005 x x 274,075 x x 544,20444.

"Evidence B No. 20" of the first instance judgment No. 5 of the 14th instance judgment is raised as "Evidence B No. 20, 37, 39".

The 5th judgment of the first instance court was followed from the above evidence of No. 18 to the "no. 3" of No. 6 of the 5th judgment.

The following circumstances are revealed in Gap evidence Nos. 6, 10, 12, 13, 16, and 17, i.e., the defendant presented a large number of pictures by asserting that the building of this case was damaged, but each of the above photographs alone does not specify which problems occurred in the family register of this case, and some of the photographs submitted by entering the family register of this case.