The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) is too unreasonable, that the punishment sentenced by the first instance court to the defendant (4 months of imprisonment) and that the punishment sentenced by the second instance to the defendant (200,000 won of fine) are too unreasonable.

2. We can take into account the following circumstances: (a) the conclusion that the Defendant appears to be somewhat different from the Defendant’s intellectual ability; (b) the degree of damage to each of the victims of the instant case is relatively minor; and (c) the Defendant committed on February 2, 2011 at Suwon District Court sentenced the Defendant to imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the time of fraud on April 7, 2011, and could have been tried simultaneously with the case that became final and conclusive on April 15, 201; (b) the Defendant committed another crime committed on April 29, 201 and June 4, 201, which did not reach the end from the time of the sentence of the said suspended sentence; (c) the Defendant committed another crime committed on June 2, 2011; (d) the previous and the period of suspended sentence was imposed on the Defendant; and (d) the Defendant’s age, growth environment, and criminal motive, etc., the sentencing of the lower court is too inappropriate.

3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's argument is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.