logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.11.14 2013고단5792
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In the Incheon District Prosecutors' Office on October 30, 2007, the defendant was subject to the disposition to forward juvenile protection cases due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) and the disposition to transfer juvenile protection cases by the Incheon District Prosecutors' Office on December 17, 2007.

1. Around 04:40 on June 9, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (measures after Accidents) (hereinafter referred to as the “Road Traffic Act”): (a) on the part of the victim E, who was a driver of a DNA cab, was parked for signalling atmosphere in the course of driving the said taxi at the speed of 587-lane from the west-dong, Nam-gu, Incheon to the west-gu, Seocheon-do, via two-lanes of the 3-lane, while standing the said taxi at the speed of the west-gu, Seocheon-gu, Incheon; (b) on the other hand, the victim E, who was a driver of the Distress cab, was absent from the Defendant; (c) on the other hand, the victim E, who was a driver of the said cab, was trying to get off the said taxi; and (d) was negligent in neglecting the duty of post-stoping, and (d) did not immediately destroy the said taxi and stop the said taxi without necessary measures.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Domination Vehicle) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident after Accidents) around 04:50 on June 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) driven a cU convenience in front of the cU convenience store in the Southern-gu Incheon Metropolitan City from the boundary of the new shopping center to the revised resources; and (b) escaped for the same reason as described in paragraph (1) above; (c) in the above E, sound a siren and attack the Defendant; (d) due to negligence committed by the victim F, who had been prior to the Defendant in the same direction, neglected the duty of care in the process of avoiding the Defendant’s course by using G Lats, thereby neglecting the duty of care in the right side of the said Laty Vehicle; and (e) by taking the cU convenience and pans around the left side of the said Laty Vehicle and treat the victim F for about two weeks.

arrow