1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a company engaged in entertainment planning agency business, entertainment education business, etc., and the Plaintiff concluded an exclusive contract with Defendant A, his mother, and Defendant B, his mother, for the purpose of supporting Defendant A’s postponement activities, and Defendant A undergo a sex surgery with Defendant A on February 17, 2013 in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul.

3. 31. Payment of the above cost of KRW 46,00,000 was made.

However, if the Defendants voluntarily reverse the exclusive contract for popular culture artists with Defendant A, they avoid meeting with the Plaintiff’s representative director, and the Plaintiff cancelled the exclusive contract for popular culture artists. As such, the Defendants are obliged to pay the expenses of sexual surgery for which the Plaintiff paid on behalf of the Plaintiff and the damages for delay.

2. The Defendants did not dispute the fact that Defendant A had undergone a sex surgery on February 17, 2013 according to the Plaintiff’s arrangement. However, as to whether the Plaintiff actually paid 46,00,000 won to the DNA surgery, it is insufficient to recognize the Plaintiff’s statement in the evidence Nos. 3 and 5. Rather, according to the evidence Nos. 1 and 2, according to the court below’s reasoning, the Defendants’ statement in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2, as the Seoul Western District Court Decision 2014Ga20830, “E did not pay 00 won to the Defendant for the Domination of the Defendant’s entertainment, so it is difficult to recognize that the Plaintiff paid 30,000 won to the Defendant, and the Defendants could not pay 30,010,000 won for the above 30,000 won to the Defendant’s 20,000 E-14,201.”