logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.08.16 2017나64110
부당이득금
Text

1. The judgment of the first instance, including the Plaintiff’s claim extended by this court, shall be modified as follows.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On February 2009, the Defendant entered into each of the instant insurance contracts with the Plaintiff (around February 24, 2015, hereinafter “Plaintiff”) who runs the insurance business (around February 2015, hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and (b) around April 2009, with the Plaintiff (around February 24, 2015, hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and (c) (around April 2009, hereinafter the combination of each of the instant insurance contracts referred to as “each of the instant insurance contracts”). The parts relating to each of the instant insurance contracts are as follows.

1. (Unclaimed Life Insurance Co-Contractor and Insured: Defendant beneficiary: The statutory inheritor and the period of contract for the Defendant: From February 24, 2009 to February 16:00 to February 24, 2052: 16:00 to February 16:00, 2052, which appears to have been guaranteed, and has been treated by doctors due to general injury (in 100,000 won), the total amount of medical expenses actually borne by the insured [the amount equivalent to 180 days from the date of the accident, 50% of the total amount of medical expenses for automobile accidents, industrial accident, etc.) which is not covered by the National Health Insurance Act (the amount equivalent to 30 million won from the date of the accident, 10,000 won: 30,000 won from the date of the death of the deceased; 300,000 won from the total amount of medical expenses for diagnosis and treatment of hospital or clinic members per day during the insurance period of contract (1,00,0,0,00,00,000 won per day after deducting the total amount of medical expenses for treatment;

arrow