1. All of the plaintiffs and plaintiffs' co-litigation's main claims and conjunctive claims are dismissed.

2...

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 26, 2006, the Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Jung-gu E (hereinafter “E”) was designated as an urban renewal acceleration district (Seoul Special Metropolitan City Notice) and the determination of urban renewal acceleration plans (H publicly notified in Seoul Special Metropolitan City) with respect to the instant improvement district (hereinafter “instant improvement zone”).

B. On January 21, 2015, in order to promote an urban environment improvement project (hereinafter “instant project”) with respect to the instant rearrangement zone, the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) held an extraordinary general meeting of the owners of land, etc. (hereinafter “instant general meeting”) by presenting the application for confirmation of the bylaws of the instant project, ② application for the confirmation of the project implementation plan and the authorization of the project implementation as each item as an agenda item, and (i) declared a resolution on each item of the instant project as 87, 4, 2, 87, and 5, with respect to the agenda.

C. Around that time, the Intervenor obtained the consent of 103 persons (79.23%) among the owners of land, etc. in the instant rearrangement zone and 12,875.00 square meters (865%) among the target area 14,858.84 square meters (86.65%) and filed an application for authorization of the project implementation plan (hereinafter “instant project implementation plan”) with the Defendant, and the Defendant issued a public notice for public inspection for authorization of the project implementation on February 25, 2015, and issued a disposition for authorization of the project implementation on April 21, 2015.

(hereinafter referred to as the "disposition of this case"). . [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 7 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap's evidence 1, Eul's evidence 1 to 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. To make entries in the attached statutes concerned;

3. The validity and legitimacy of the instant disposition

A. Facts of recognition 1) The rules of the instant project (hereinafter “instant rules”).

Article 23 (Preparation and Alteration of Code and Project Implementation Plan) related to the "Rules and Project Implementation Plan" in this section (The first preparation or modification of Code and Project Implementation Plan).