Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 8, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter referred to as “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) led the Defendant to drive a car of the above vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the 14:25 B and drive the two lanes in the direction of calculating the speed from the speed of about 10 km to the speed of about 10 km in Incheon Bupyeong-gu, the speed of 222:3rd. At the time, the Defendant was negligent in driving the vehicle of the victim C (54 years old), the vehicle of the same E (46,00) driving, the FRati vehicle of the same E (38 years old,00) driving in the same G (38 years old,), while the vehicle of the Hro of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle. Accordingly, the Defendant following the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle of the vehicle is negligent in performing his duty.

The parts of the upper part of the car, etc. are concealed by the upper part of the car, etc., and the upper part of the car was pushed by the upper part of the car, and the upper part of the car was towed by the shock, and the car was towed by the shock, and the car was pushed by the upper part of the car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, suffered from the victim C with three occins and tensions, two occins and occins and two occins and occins and two occins and two occins and occins and occins and two occins and occins and occins and occins and occins and two occins and occins and occins, respectively.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act, due to the drilling accident like the above 1.3, damaged the property equivalent to KRW 1,151,350, such as the front fluor of the fluor vehicle, and damaged the property equivalent to KRW 444,50, such as the compact fluor cluor, etc. of the fluor vehicle.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, without purchasing mandatory insurance, operated the same vehicle as the above 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1.With respect to E and G: