logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.12.13 2018고단1872
사기등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and by imprisonment with prison labor for a period of four months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2018 Highest 1872"

1. The Defendants’ joint crime committed on October 10, 2014, Defendant A, along with Defendant B, who moved the victim E into the said officetel in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu Officetel D, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, to the said officetel, would give the victim the profits later if he/she made an investment in the F Energy beverage company.

If the old unit is 2.5 million won, and if the investment of 2.5 million won per old unit is made, 200 won shall be paid in 200,000 won and 4 million won shall be paid.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the Defendants did not have any connection with the F Energy beverage company and did not have the intent or ability to pay agreed profits even if they received money from the victims.

On October 10, 2014, the Defendants received KRW 25 million from the damaged party to the G bank account in Defendant A’s name.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to attract the victim to receive the goods.

2. Defendant A

A. On July 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 10:00 on July 22, 2015, the second floor office of HU building in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, would have a virtual currency to the victim I, “AJ supplementing the problems of the bitcoin; (b) currently at least 500 won per opening, but at the end of the year, the Defendant would have a KRW 2,000 on the back of the year.

The head of JJ is responsible for internal affairs.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the J is very low value unlike the virtual currency widely used such as bit Coin, and no foreign transaction has been conducted in Korea, and there is almost no foreign transaction performance. The Defendant did not have any intention or ability to pay the victim with the virtual currency even if he received the money from the injured party for the purpose of the J purchase.

On July 22, 2015, the Defendant received KRW 9 million from the damaged party to the corporate bank account under the name of the Defendant, and received KRW 10 million from the same account on August 14, 2015, and received KRW 29 million on three occasions, such as remittance of KRW 10 million to the same account on August 18, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim.

arrow