1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s request for retrial is dismissed.

2. The costs of the retrial shall be the plaintiff-Counterclaim defendant.

1. According to the records of this case, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit claiming consolation money on the ground that the defendant posted a statement that defames the plaintiff as shown in the judgment subject to retrial as shown in the separate sheet No. 2, and the defendant filed a lawsuit claiming consolation money on the ground that the plaintiff posted a statement that harms the defendant's reputation on the Internet site as a counterclaim (U.S. District Court Decision 2014No246854, No. 12515, Jul. 15, 2015 (Counterclaim)). The above court rendered a ruling dismissing all the principal suit and counterclaim on July 15, 2015, and all the plaintiff and the defendant appealed, and the appellate court [2015No. 28309, No. 28316, Nov. 21, 2016 (Counterclaim), which did not affect the plaintiff's request for retrial, and thus, the court did not dismiss the judgment against the plaintiff and the defendant's counterclaim on the ground that it did not exercise its right to request for retrial (hereinafter "the judgment of retrial").

2. The defendant's judgment on the grounds for retrial of this case shall be the petition for retrial of this case.