1. The defendant-appellant, C, D, and E jointly share the amount of KRW 15 million, and the defendant-appellant F, G, H, and I jointly share the amount of KRW 15 million.

1. According to the evidence No. 1 to No. 13 of the judgment on the cause of the claim, the plaintiff's reputation is recognized as a civilian worker who works in the K and K and the K and the K LAF as a Korean wife and works in the U.S.P. M. as a civilian worker. Thus, the above two media organizations and the defendants, who are their reporters, are jointly liable to compensate for mental damage suffered by the plaintiff.

2. As to the defendants' assertion

A. The Defendants asserted that the contents of each of the instant reports were not specifically specified by the Plaintiff, the victim, and that they were not unlawful in terms of public interest.

B. In full view of the purport of the entire argument in Gap evidence No. 1, the plaintiff specifically identified the contents of the above two media reports, and it is difficult to view the contents of each of the reports of this case as public interest. Thus, each of the above arguments by the defendants are not acknowledged.

3. If so, Defendant 1 or 4 is jointly obligated to pay KRW 15 million and KRW 15 million in collaboration with Defendant 5 or 8, and the remainder of the Plaintiff’s claim is dismissed.