logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.07.31 2013고단3475
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On September 28, 2006, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Incheon District Court, and on August 25, 2010, the Incheon District Court issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, and on June 29, 2012, issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Incheon District Court.

【Criminal Fact-finding 【The Defendant, despite the past records of punishment twice or more due to drinking driving, driven a Bunst motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.173% without a driver’s license on May 5, 2013 at approximately 50 meters from the front of the “ sand-in market” in the Southern-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Namdong-gu, Incheon to the front road of the “dong-dong-dong,” located in the Namdong-gu, Incheon.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on proper launch of drivers, and the register of driver's licenses;

1. Previous records: Application of criminal records, etc. and other Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Mitigation of discretionary work and mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the fact that the mistake of a person is recognized and reflected, and the fact that there is no past record of punishment heavier than the fine);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (the preceding part of the Criminal Act shall be repeatedly considered for the benefit of the defendant);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;

arrow