logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2018.04.18 2017나51300
부당이득금반환등
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding "it is not possible to exercise the right to exclusive use and benefit because of a significant change in the utilization status of the land of this case after the plaintiff inherited the land of this case" to "the result of the party appraiser K's stamp image appraisal" in the front of the "written consent to land use of land of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case of the court of first instance" as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act of this case of this case of this case of this case of this case.

2. The plaintiff's claim for the conclusion must be dismissed due to the lack of reasonable grounds.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow