beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On December 27, 200, the Plaintiff and C are legally married couple who completed a marriage report, and have one son and son under their chain. On October 26, 2016, after the instant lawsuit was filed, C filed a divorce lawsuit against the Plaintiff (Seoul Family Court 2016ddan3325).
B. The Defendant and C maintained an inappropriate relationship from around December 2015, even though they were members of the broadband, which was created for the purpose of mutual communication between men and women.
[Ground of recognition] The entry of Gap evidence 1 and 3, the images of Gap evidence 2 and 4, the witness E's testimony, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The allegations and judgment of the parties
A. The plaintiff asserts that the defendant, even though he was aware that he was a spouse of C, committed an unlawful act and thereby infringed or obstructed the maintenance of the plaintiff's common life, the defendant is obligated to pay consolation money of 30 million won to the plaintiff as compensation for damages caused by the illegal act, and that the defendant did not know that C was a spouse while maintaining an inappropriate relationship with C.
B. The facts that the Defendant established an inappropriate relationship from February 2016 with C even though the Plaintiff, who was his spouse, was the Plaintiff, are as seen earlier.
However, in full view of the overall purport of the arguments in the witness E’s testimony, the following circumstances, namely, the Defendant and C met with the NA as a member of unmarried or divorced male and female, and there was no separate procedure to prove his/her qualification as a member of the Banda, and C introduced himself/herself as a divorce, and the above Banda was merely about 10 members of the Banda, and it stated that E was aware of the fact that he/she was his/her spouse at the time of the instant lawsuit. The Defendant maintained an inappropriate relationship with C and the Plaintiff’s telephone around August 8, 2016.