1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of

【The parts to be removed or added】 4. 10, 11, and 13 of the 4th 4th 10, 13 of this Court’s “this Court” shall be read as “the first instance court,” and “the fact-finding results with respect to the Samsung Seoul Hospital Head of this Court,” added “the first instance court.”

From the last 6th to 7th 2th 2th am of the 6th am, the phrase “16th am above normal level” was deleted, and the phrase “in the case of the age of 80, there is a medical opinion that the degree of approximately 65m Hg in the case of the age of 80” was average, including “in the case of the age of 80 due to the decline in the age of 60 meters, the average 60-90m Hgg in the case of the age of 80, the average 60-90m Hg in the case of the age of 80.” After the last 7th am, the respiratory medicine specialist of the Samsung Seoul Hospital, which evaluated the medical records of the deceased, presented the opinion that the pulmonary tuberculosis of the deceased was merged with the pneumoconiosis symptoms of the deceased without any specific basis in the first instance trial.” However, this court does not add any opinion that the deceased’s pulmonary tuberculosis was not related to the pneumoconiosis.”

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.