The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and one hundred and sixty hours of community service order) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is contrary to the recognition of all of the crimes of this case, and it is recognized that the defendant has agreed with the victims, that the defendant suffered from the injury in this case, and that there is a family member to support the defendant, but the crime of this case is not appropriate for the quality of the crime, such as the defendant's injury to the victim B due to a fluor's disease, which is a dangerous object, and the statutory punishment of the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective deadly weapon, etc.) is three years or more, since the punishment of the court below is a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. (a collective weapon, etc.), the punishment of the defendant, which was sentenced by the court below, including all the circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing such as age, character, environment, family relationship

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[However, ex officio in accordance with Article 25 of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, the "a point of interference with business" in Part 4 shall be corrected to "a point of interference with business" in the application of the law of the judgment of the court below.