1. The Defendant’s KRW 245,00,000 as well as 6% per annum from April 25, 2013 to September 5, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

1. Fact-finding insurance name: From May 23, 2012 to May 23, 2080, the insurance policy holder: the insurance policy holder: the insurance contract amount of the plaintiff insured - the amount equivalent to the payment rate of the subscription amount for the basic contract (200 million won): the insurance amount of the plaintiff insured - the payment of the amount equivalent to the X payment rate of at least 3% of the injury in the event of the aftermath disability (Renewal of the subscription amount): the payment equivalent to the X payment rate of the subscription amount in the event of the aftermath disability (the subscription amount of 50 million won): the amount of the aftermath disability of at least 3% of the injury;

A. On May 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a comprehensive insurance contract with the Defendant with the following content (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

B. On September 1, 2012, the Plaintiff was involved in an accident in which stuffs were removed from the left side of the Plaintiff while moving stuffs containing books, personal parcels, etc. at one’s workplace.

(hereinafter “the instant insurance accident”). After the occurrence of the instant insurance accident, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the Ganbuk University Hospital on September 25, 2012 with the optositic lebal lebal lebal lebal lebal lebal lebal lebal lebalopic lebal lebal lebal lebals, and received the lebal lebal lebal lebal lebal lebal and artificial insemination

However, even after the above surgery, the Plaintiff’s vision was not restored, and the Plaintiff’s vision was measured on April 4, 2013 by 1.0 of the friendly vision and 0.025 of the Coordinate vision (based on the corrected eyesight) at the Gyeongbuk University Hospital.

C. The Plaintiff’s injury on the part of the Plaintiff under the Defendant’s insurance policy classification table constitutes “when one eye’s correction eyesight is less than 0.02” of class 4, and the payment rate under the insurance policy is 35%.

On April 22, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant for the payment of insurance proceeds against the instant insurance accident, but the Defendant rejected such claim and did not pay insurance proceeds up to now.

[Evidence Evidence] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence 1 to Gap evidence, Gap evidence 6, each entry of Gap evidence 18, the result of physical appraisal of appraiser C, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim, the defendant, unless there are special circumstances, shall raise objection to the plaintiff.