logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.02.12 2018고단4773
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 8, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 700,000 by the Gwangju District Court for the violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a summary order of KRW 3 million by the Gwangju District Court for the violation of the Road Traffic Act on May 8, 2013, respectively.

On October 29, 2018, at around 22:30, the Defendant driven B rocketing car under the influence of alcohol content of about 500 meters from the 500-meter section to the estal distance in front of the water zone located in the same endal 63-ro of the same Gu, from the new post office located in the New Mine-ro 61, Gwangju Metropolitan City.

2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) is a person engaging in driving a B rocketing car.

On October 29, 2018, the Defendant driven the above car at around 22:30, and led to the driving distance in front of the water reduction zone, which is located in the 63-ro of the number of Gwangju Mine-gu, according to the five-lane distance from the surface of the New Post Office to the flood reduction zone.

At the time, other automobiles are stopped on the front side of the car, and in such a case, there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by checking the driving direction of the front side vehicle and properly operating the operation system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was negligent in operating the brake system and was negligent in operating it properly, and was found to have been in the front part of the victim C(the 45-year-old driver) who was stopping in accordance with the new subparagraph at the front section of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant driven the said car in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drinking, and suffered injury to the victim, such as salt dump, tension, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Exemplary drivers;

arrow