logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.02.16 2016고단7193
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 30, 2016, around 00:10 on October 30, 2016, the Defendant was in the vicinity of D Mart in Busan Dong-gu C.

The E-cafeteria entered the restaurant, and the 53 years of age was completed the business of the Victim F (n, 53 years of age) who is an employee, but the Nara Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Had the above F Had the above F Had Had the above Had the above Had Had the above Had the above Had.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H, F, and G;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Investigation report (to attach a written diagnosis of injury to the victim G;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment (elective of imprisonment);

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes [the scope of recommending] No person who does not exist in the basic area (from April to January 1) (the general person in charge of sentencing) [the decision of sentencing] (the person in charge of special sentencing] of the first type of bodily injury (the scope of recommending punishment] of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes [the decision of sentencing] the defendant committed each of the crimes in this case again despite the fact that the defendant had been punished four times for the same kind of crime, the degree of damage has not been recovered, and the degree of damage has not been recovered even if the defendant had no record of punishment heavier than the fine (the defendant is not detained in court to give an opportunity

arrow