The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. When the victim has been a Tracker, the defendant has stopped the Tracker and proceeded with the Track part of the Tracker, and there is no fact that the Tracker proceeds.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (six months of imprisonment without prison labor) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the witness E’s trial statement of the trial court and F’s statement of the police statement of the witness E on the day of the instant case, the victim E and F sent the victim E and F when the victim E and F go to the defendant. The fact that he left the venue and left it by getting off the track, the victim E was stopped, and the fact that the track was closed, and the victim E was in the vicinity of the festival, the victim E was in progress by the defendant, and the victim E was under the center of the road installed after the Trackter, the center was lost, and the center was over the left-hand side, and the victim E got out of the center of the street installed after the Trackter. The fact that the victim E was reported on the day of the instant case, and the fact that the victim E was told about the outbreak of the victim E is recognized as well, according to the above fact-finding, it is sufficient to recognize the facts charged in this case. Therefore, the above defendant’s assertion is without merit.

B. Although there are circumstances to consider the Defendant’s failure to hear any noise due to the Defendant’s fault and the fact that the Defendant’s negligence combined with the Defendant’s negligence, the degree of injury to the victim E caused by the instant case is very serious, and there is no effort to recover the damage of the Defendant’s victim E, and the Defendant’s age, environment, health conditions, circumstances of the instant crime, circumstances after the instant crime, etc., and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments, such as the records and arguments, are considered as inappropriate, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit.

3. Conclusion.