logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2014.08.22 2014고합33
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복폭행등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

A seized knife (No. 1) shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 21, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year from the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Retaliatory Crime, etc.) in the Daegu District Court and its racing support, and the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence in the first prison of North Korea on July 6, 2013.

1. From July 12, 2013 to April 15, 2014, the Defendant: (a) released from prison to prison on July 6, 2013; and (b) tried to find out the main points of the operation of the Victim C, around 23:00 on July 12, 2013, in order to resisting that the Defendant would have been sentenced to punishment for committing a crime against Victim C.

The Defendant interfered with the victim’s main business by force, such as: (a) the victim’s sound, “one year due to a stormer,” and (b) the 30 minutes and more; (c) the customers are able to take a bath at a large interest; and (d) the customers are unable to enter into the main shop.

In addition, from around that time to April 15, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force, such as the list of crimes in the attached list.

2. The Defendant, on May 11, 2014, committed the crime, at the instant week E, was sentenced to imprisonment twice with the victim’s report at the victim’s seat, and was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor, with the intent of retaliationing the respect to his character.

At around 19:20 on May 11, 2014, the Defendant found the foregoing E main point and refused to provide alcohol to the victim C, and turned out the food blade (24.5cm in total length, 13.5cm in length on the day), which is a dangerous object that had been prepared in advance, and moved out from the main place of the ship, to the victim, and she saw the victim as “Semane, v. S. S., S., I will take the bath,” and she put the victim as a brut.

On the other hand, the defendant continued to go out of the main place of the unclaimed guest, and again went back to the main place and took a bath to the main place of the victim.

As a result, the defendant is in danger of the victim for the purpose of retaliation against criminal reports.

arrow