The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts) and the statement in CCTV images and diagnosis, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the defendant on the ground that the defendant was not guilty on the ground that the relation between the defendant's assault and the injury of the victim is not recognized, even though the victim could be found to have gone about the victim's hand in the process of preventing the assault by the defendant.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. The Defendant and C, the summary of the instant facts charged, were satisfy-fin-law relationship.

The Defendant, at around 16:00 on September 8, 2017, expressed that the victim C cannot see himself/herself and son in the “E” mobile phone store located in Silung-si D in Silung-si, and expressed his/her desire to “the value of taxing and treating in the Republic of Korea during the same year as the three years in which he/she sold his/her arms” and “the value of taxing and treating in the Republic of Korea during the course of a dispute.”

Around 2 weeks of treatment was required for the victim, such as the victim's left side bucks around three times with the floor of hand, and the victim's multi-locks were placed on the victim's side.

B. The judgment of the court below and the court below held that the diagnosis of injury is recognized as being indicated in the column of the part and degree of the injury as "the part and the part in front part", and therefore, the part of the injury is part of the part and the part in front part. On the spot CCTV, even if the defendant viewed the part in front of the defendant's chest with two fingers, it does not seem to be a part of the part in front of that part, but rather, it appears that the police tried not to go out of the part in front of that part in front of the part in front of that part in front of the part and the part in front of the part in front of that part, and therefore, the defendant suffered the injury by the defendant's assault.

It is difficult to see that there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and the defendant was acquitted.

Examining the above circumstances by comparing them with the records, the court below’s facts charged have been proven.

The judgment of the court below that it is difficult to see is just and acceptable (the witness C).