1. Plaintiff, among the property damage portions of the judgment of the court of first instance, equivalent to the following additional payment order.

With respect to the judgment of the party before remanding the case after remanding the case, the defendant filed each appeal against the plaintiff and the plaintiffs before remanding the case (the plaintiff's appeal was not filed). The Supreme Court reversed and remanded only the part against the plaintiff as to property damage in the judgment of the party before remanding the case, and the part against the plaintiff as to the property damage in the judgment of the party before remanding the case has already become final and conclusive with the exception of the part against the plaintiff as to property damage in the judgment of the party before remanding the case. Thus, the judgment of the party after remand the case is limited to the part against the plaintiff as to the property damage that was reversed and remanded during the plaintiff's claim.

Basic Facts

The following facts may be acknowledged by taking into account the following facts, or there is no dispute between the parties, or the whole purport of the arguments as a result of the request for physical examination of the head of the hospital of the first instance, as a result of the request for physical examination of the head of the hospital of the first instance.

The defendant is a foundation established and operated as a general hospital or any other foundation established and operated by a medical institution (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant hospital"), and the plaintiff is a person who was administered in spinal fladism in order to treat the climatic signboard escape symptoms, etc. at the defendant hospital on March 23, 2004.

Since 1998, the Plaintiff was showing symptoms on both the outer and left part of both arms, but did not receive any specific treatment since July 2003, and the Plaintiff started to receive any pain from around July 2003.

8.5. The defendant hospital was transferred to the Ministry of Health and Welfare, and as a result of various examinations, the defendant hospital was diagnosed as the "Gebrate No. 5-6 and the left-hand injury disease No. 5."

After that, the Plaintiff received towing, physical therapy, etc. from another medical institution, and continued to provide pains, it is again back to the department outside the hospital of the Defendant on February 25, 2004.