beta
Text
1. The defendant shall enter each real estate listed in the separate sheet 1 in the separate sheet 2 of the plaintiffs' final inheritance shares.
Reasons
1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties or may be acknowledged in full view of the overall purport of the pleadings in each of the statements in evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 2, 3, 5, 3-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 4-1, 4-2, 3, 5, 5, 6-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7-1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7-1, 3, 4, 5, 1, and 2-2.
In the Land Survey Book drawn up at the Japanese occupation point, P was under the circumstances of “Yeung-gun Q 202”, “Yeung-gun of Gyeongung-do”, “Yeung-gun of Gyeongung-do”, “Yeung-gun of Gyeong-do 930 square meters”, and “Yeung-do Yung-gun Tak-gun 27 square meters”.
(B) Each of the above lands became each land indicated in the separate sheet after conversion of the area, conversion of land category, and change of administrative district; hereinafter referred to as “each of the above lands”). The former Land Survey Division does not indicate the address of P, a situation titleholder.
B. As to each land of this case, the old land cadastre is written as “P” by the owner of each land of this case, and the address of the owner is not written.
C. On January 10, 1935, the Plaintiff’s fleet U had a permanent domicile in Kimcheon-si, and upon the death of January 10, 1935, W, South-Nam, as the family heir, succeeded to the property solely as the wife X and children, Y, Z, Plaintiff J, and AA. On October 4, 1970, X died on May 2, 1972, and Y, Z, Z, J, and AA inherited the property. D.
Since then, due to the death of Y, Z, and AA, each of their spouses and children succeeded to the property, and the plaintiffs A, B, C, and D (E before the opening of the name) who are children of Y due to the death of YA, among YB, AB, and their children, and the plaintiffs E, F, G, H (former the opening of the name), I, I, and the plaintiffs K, L, M, N, andO, who are their spouses and children of Z, inherited each property in the proportion of the final shares in the attached list 2.
E. Each land of this case is currently unregistered.
2. The defendant's judgment on this safety defense raises objection against the defendant.