logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2019.05.16 2019가합5779
임대차보증금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 270,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from January 17, 2019 to January 30, 2019 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

(However, the “creditor” is deemed to be the Plaintiff, and the “debtor” shall be deemed to be the “Defendant”). 2. A judgment to recommend confession (Article 208(3)2 and Article 150(3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act) must state in the written reply whether or not the facts recorded in the written complaint are recognized in addition to the reply to the purport of the claim.

(Article 65(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure. However, although the defendant submitted a written objection against the payment order on February 11, 2019, the defendant merely stated that "an objection is raised against the payment order" was stated to the purport that "an objection is raised against the payment order," there is no specific answer as to the cause of the claim stated by the plaintiff in the application for the payment order

Therefore, the defendant is deemed to have led to the confession of the plaintiff's assertion.

arrow