The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of all the circumstances, including the fact that the defendant is against whom the summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., the two-year imprisonment) is against the defendant, the punishment sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the defendant was committed by the crime of this case and his mistake is divided.

However, the crime of this case was committed on October 11, 2012 by: (a) by forcing the Defendant to keep the proceeds of paid household appliances by intrusion upon the hospital, etc.; (b) theft of the victim’s property by entering the restaurant, etc. using a cafeteria that was not corrected; (c) multiple offenses of larceny have been committed several times with good methods using the hospital, etc. that free access and surveillance was neglected; and (d) the Defendant was committed on June 1, 201, with the exception of a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc., at the Daejeon District Court sentenced two years of suspension of execution; (b) the Defendant did not know that there was a high possibility of criticism for recidivism of the Defendant; and (c) the Defendant was not punished by imprisonment with prison labor from Daejeon District Court on May 29, 2009 to a fine of KRW 16,000,000,000 from Daejeon District Court on February 16, 201.