logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.03.24 2016고단106
향토예비군설치법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a member of the local reserve forces in the 119 jointly and severally belonging to the 119 member of the three units and the two units.

1. The Defendant, at around 19:00 on November 6, 2015, received a notice of convening a training in the name of the third unit commander of the 5870 Army, and the Defendant did not undergo the above training without justifiable grounds, even though he received a notice of convening a training in the name of the third unit commander of the 5870 Army, which was conducted at the training site of the reserve forces in the Kimhae-si on November 24, 2015.

2. The Defendant received a notice of convening a training call in the name of the third unit commander of the 5870 unit 5870 unit at the Army, but did not undergo the training without justifiable grounds, in the same time and place as mentioned in the preceding paragraph, and “to attend the second unit of the training site at the Kimhae-si Reserve Forces on November 25, 2015 (the carried-over training, eight hours).”

3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as referred to in the preceding paragraph, and “after attending the second supplement (six hours carried forward training, six hours) conducted at the training site of the Reserve Forces in Kimhae-si on November 26, 2015,” did not undergo the said training without justifiable grounds even when he/she received a notice of convening the training in the name of the third unit commander of the 5870 unit in the Army.

4. The Defendant received a notice of convening a training call in the name of the third unit commander of the 5870th unit in the Army and received a notice of convening a training call in the name of the third unit commander of the 5870 unit in the Army, but did not receive the above training without good cause.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written accusation and a receipt of notice of call-up;

1. Photographs photographs of each registered mail received;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing receipt of each call notice;

1. Article 15(9)1 and Article 6(1) of the Act on the Establishment of Local Reserve Forces for the Establishment of the same Act as well as Article 15(9)1 and Article 6(1) of the Act on the Establishment of Local Reserve Forces for the Establishment of the same Act, and the choice of imprisonment (the defendant had been punished several times for the same type of crime, but has committed each of the crimes

arrow