Text
1. As to Plaintiff A’s KRW 161,170,389, and KRW 3,000,000 to Plaintiff B, and each of the said money from January 29, 2007 to January 201.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. On January 28, 2007, D means F-si owned by E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant-Vehicle”) around 01:20 on January 28, 2007
2) The Plaintiff’s first left side of the Plaintiff’s I driver’s first left side of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was proceeding on the right side in order to allow the Plaintiff to board a customer on the side of the road at a speed of about 20 km in the speed of about a speed of 20 km in the front side of H in the city of Ansan-dong, while driving the Plaintiff, and driving the said three-lane, and driving the said three-lane into the right side of the Defendant’s vehicle. Accordingly, the Plaintiff shocked the front left side of the J-owned K driver’s vehicle, which was parked on the right side of the road (hereinafter “instant accident”).
(2) As a result, the above Plaintiff suffered from injury, such as Radral chlorate, padal chlostalum, chlostal chlostalum, etc. (2) Plaintiff B is the father of Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is the insurer who entered into a mutual aid agreement with the owner for the purpose of compensating for damages under the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act.
B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for all damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case.
C. The limitation of liability: (a) even if the Plaintiff had to drive a defensive vehicle, such as reducing the speed of the vehicle in preparation for the change of the vehicle in preparation for the change of the vehicle, the Plaintiff neglected to do so; and (b) such error is deemed to have caused the occurrence of the instant accident and the expansion of damages; (c) in calculating the Defendant’s amount of damages, it is reasonable to consider it in light of the circumstances surrounding the instant accident, etc., and therefore, the Defendant’s liability is limited to 90%.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts that there is no dispute or do not clearly dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence 2 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Scope of compensation for damage.