Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, each of the above penalties shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 01, 2016, the Defendants: D'D' in 03:10 on October 01, 201, in an entertainment drinking house, which was called 'D', and called 'D', and called 'D', which was called 112, and called 'the issue related to entertainment drinking service', on the ground that the police officer conducted a survey on the circumstances of the case and Defendant B called 'C', 'C', which was called 'C' and called 'C', 'C', which was called 'C', which was called 'C' and called 'C', 'C', the main employee of which was called 'C' and 'C', and continuously, Defendant A exceeded the border of the above G, left kn the rank of the police officer, and left kn't the rank of Defendant B', and Defendant B's 'D'’’.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to G and E;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the selective Defendants of the punishment: Articles 136 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [The defendants shall have no criminal history of the same kind of crime (the defendants B shall be the first offender), and favorable circumstances such as the defendants' being against the law];

1. Defendants of the community service order: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act or more.