logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.10.16 2013가단212987 (1)
손해배상(산)
Text

1. Defendant D’s 68,00,000 won, Plaintiff B, and C respectively, and each of them from March 26, 2009.

Reasons

1. Whether liability for damages arises;

A. 1) On March 26, 2009, Plaintiff A is an EVA projector crowdfunding in the Giberbal Industry-Academic Cooperation Center located in the Gannam Information and Industry-Academic Cooperation Center (hereinafter “instant sunset”).

(i)In the night work, he was listed on the machine to remove a pipe, and he was inflicted an injury on the fluor by cutting the fluor, etc. on the wind to the fluor where the fluor is narrow (hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”).

(2) Plaintiff B and C are the parents of Plaintiff A, and Defendant D was a person who entered into a labor contract with Plaintiff A and engaged in the manufacture and sale of new products. The Gyeongnam Information University, which was affiliated with the Defendant Educational Institute of the East Korean Development (hereinafter “Defendant Juristic Person”), operated the sand manufacturing room in which the instant horse intermediary was installed for industry-academic cooperation, based on the new fashion industry.

B. The Plaintiffs’ assertion and determination Plaintiffs asserted that the instant accident occurred due to negligence by the Defendants’ negligence to prevent the malfunction of the instant crowdfunding, and in particular, the Defendant Company, as a school enterprise located in the Gyeongnam Information University, has received human resources supply through Defendant D, the wife of the F, and in fact, Defendant E was led to the creation of new technology, and thus, Plaintiff E is liable to compensate for the instant accident as the actual employer of Plaintiff A.

Defendant D, as an employer who directly employs the Plaintiff A, was unable to perform his duty of safety consideration in the course of his work, due to the occurrence of the instant accident, he is liable to compensate for the damages incurred therefrom.

However, in the case of the defendant corporation, the defendant corporation was a school corporation with E, obtained profits from the manufacture and sale of new technology, and used the instant crowdfunding for the practical training of students belonging to the corporation for the manufacture of new technology, and the defendant D used the instant crowdfunding facilities including the instant sunset.

arrow