logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.11.12 2015나1530
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The reasoning for the court's explanation on this case is as follows: Gap evidence No. 8-1 through No. 153 was not adopted on whether equal heat of the existing building of this case was due to the new construction of this case; the result of a fact-finding on each video and appraiser G of the previous building of this case; and the result of the fact-finding on the newly constructed building of this case was not infringed beyond the tolerance limit under the social norms; except for adding the result of fact-finding on the appraiser H of the previous building of this case as evidence insufficient to prove that the sunshine of this case was not infringed beyond the tolerance limit under the social norms, it is identical to the part of the reasoning for the judgment of the court

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow