The instant lawsuit is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff joined the Marine Corps on August 1, 1966 and served in Vietnam War on July 8, 1967.

September 30, 1973 discharged from military service.

B. On June 30, 199, the Plaintiff filed an application for the registration of patients suffering from actual aftereffects of defoliants, and determined that the Maneneneneal disease was suffering from actual aftereffects of defoliants, high blood pressure, and cerebral transfusions. However, as a result of the physical examination, the Plaintiff was determined to have failed to meet the rating standards, and the degree of disability in the Do with high blood pressure, and the Malial transfusion.

C. On February 20, 2002, the Plaintiff applied for a physical examination for re-verification on the ground of the aggravation of the mathalosis, and was judged on March 7, 2002 by Grade 6-6(2)44 of the disability rating.

The plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking the revocation of the above judgment and won the lawsuit, and received the judgment of class 1 (2) 3 of the disability rating on December 1, 2003.

However, since it is possible to conduct a single conduct against the plaintiff, a civil petition filed for a reclassification error, and became a person subject to a reclassification physical examination on January 5, 2007, and received the judgment of Grade 6-6 (2) 44 of the disability rating around August 2007.

The plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking the revocation of the above judgment but lost it.

E. On June 24, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an application for a reclassification physical examination, and was judged as Grade 6(2) of the disability rating with the Malipane’s disease on August 16, 2010.

The plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking the revocation of the above judgment but lost it.

F. On June 25, 2012, the Plaintiff applied for a re-examination on a trial basis. On December 4, 2013, 2013, the Plaintiff was issued a judgment of Grade 6, Paragraph 1, Paragraph 1, Paragraph 4113 of the disability rating with the Manene

The plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking the revocation of the above judgment but lost it.

G. On November 26, 2005, the Plaintiff filed an application for a re-examination with the head of the Jeon-dong Veterans Branch Office for a trial, and received notification that there was no change in the disability rating on October 6, 2016 (hereinafter “instant prior disposition”).

H. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking the revocation of the instant prior disposition with the Jeonju District Court 2016Gudan865, and the said court on December 26, 2018.