The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who was a taxi engineer belonging to C.

On August 16, 2013, from around 21:55 to 22:10 of the same day, the Defendant attempted to pay charges by using credit cards from the victim F (F) (F) who was a customer who was on board from the rice station, but did not settle the charges, the Defendant demanded the victim to transfer his account number to the account, after informing the victim of his account number.

However, the Defendant was found to have been aware of the test number and company number to be transferred to the company by the victim, and the Defendant was “(i.e., the processed matter. Dog, whether the money is close, or not.”

At this time, the victim's dump dump dump dump dump, and the defendant who dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump dump, and dump dump dumpd

2. Grounds for dismissing the public prosecution; and

(a) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention (Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act);

B. Withdrawal of the victim's wish to punish after the prosecution of this case

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act);