logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.08.24 2017고단1074
폭행
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged “2017 Highest 1074,” on January 13, 2017, the Defendant 13:15, on the ground that “A victim D (19 years old) who was delivered food ordered by the Defendant before Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, sent the food ordered by the Defendant, sent the food to one hand, and delivered the food to another hand,” on the ground that “a bit of bit of bitch bit of a bitch bit of a bitch, food, etc., was sent to the Defendant.”

C. As the gugue died, the victim tried to take his hand while intending to do so, and the victim abusedd the victim by pushing the victim with the defect of 112 report on mobile phone and by walking flaging flag at one time through the flag.

around 10:00 on September 29, 2016, the Defendant: (a) called the victim F ( South Korea, 21 years of age) who belongs to the E-dong reserve forces Dong Dong 1, called the victim, called the victim himself/herself; and (b) around that time, called the victim, called the Dong office of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and the E-dong reserve forces located in the third floor of the above building; (c) taken the victim into the victim's face from the toilet of the above building 1st floor of the building 3 times at a time, she taken the victim's face from the toilet of the above building 1st floor of the building 3 times, and pushed the victim's face one time on a drinking.

The Defendant committed violence against the victim as above.

2. Each of the facts charged in the instant case can not be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act as an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, it can be known that the agreement on August 18, 2017, after the institution of the instant prosecution, stating the victim's expression of intention not to punish the defendant, was submitted. Thus, all of the instant prosecutions are dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow