logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.08.25 2016고단2309
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(공중밀집장소에서의추행)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 21, 2016, around 18:35, the Defendant was boarding the bus at the bus stops located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D market, and was seated above the victim F (V, 24 years old). The Defendant got off the bus at the bus stops located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Accordingly, the defendant committed indecent acts against the victim in means of public transportation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the report of investigation;

1. Article 11 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes and the Selection of Criminal Crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to attend a lecture;

1. In full view of various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, occupation, family environment, social ties, criminal record and risk of recidivism, profits and preventive effects expected due to the instant disclosure order and notification order, disadvantages and side effects, etc., there are special circumstances in which the Defendant’s personal information may not be disclosed or notified.

(C) The Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the Defendant was physically and mentally deprived or physically weak at the time of the instant crime.

In light of various circumstances, such as the background and means of the crime committed by each of the above evidence, the details of the crime, and the defendant's behavior before and after the crime, it cannot be deemed that the defendant had no or weak ability to discern things under the influence of alcohol at the time of the crime in this case, and thus, the above assertion is rejected.

The circumstances below the reasons for sentencing, and the age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and crime of the defendant.

arrow