logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.03.24 2016고합331 (2)
변호사법위반등
Text

1. The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Status and Relations of the Parties] E is a person working at the J which ordered removal works from the F Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association, G Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association, H Development and Improvement Project Association, and I. From around 2007 to the end of December 2013, E is a site manager at the construction site of the F Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association from the end of December 2013 to the end of August 2015, and is a person working as the site manager at the construction site of H Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association from the end of August 2015 to the end of August 2015.

K is the Director of the G Construction Site of the above J, Defendant A is the above Director of the said J, L is the Director of the said J’s H Construction Site, M is the Director of the said J’s H Construction Site, and N is the person working as the Director of the said J’s I Construction Site.

Defendant

B In operating “O” and “P,” a person awarded a subcontract for removal works at the construction site of G, H, I, Q apartment, and F.

[Criminal facts]

1. Around June 20, 2014, Defendant B and K conspiredd to obtain the construction cost by means of remitting the difference of the construction cost as Defendant B’s unfilled to K if the construction cost is deposited after Defendant B filed a claim with the victim J by unfusing the construction cost as if Defendant B did not perform the construction work corresponding to the claim amount of the construction cost, even though Defendant B and K did not perform the construction work corresponding to that amount.

Defendant

B and K around June 20, 2014, at the G construction site, and the fact was conducted even if the removal work equivalent to KRW 8,500,000 was not performed, and as such, it submitted to the J with the documents, etc., which unwrittened the construction cost, and it received KRW 8,50,000 from an employee in the name of the J who was in the name of the J to the Defendant B’s account, and then remitted it again to the Bank in the name of K until May 29, 2015, and received KRW 20,000,000 from the total three times, such as the attached list of crimes (5).

2. Defendant B and M.

arrow