logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원영월지원 2017.06.07 2015가단10467
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion is that the plaintiffs are private-si operators in Hsi, and defendant A is the chairperson, defendant B, C, D, and E of the I Committee (hereinafter referred to as the "Committee"), the officers of the Committee of this case, and defendant G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Company") is the company that the Committee of this case selects as a business entity that establishes the call taxi system, and defendant F is the representative director of the defendant company.

H From October 15, 2012 to December 28, 2012, H City selected the instant committee composed of individuals, corporations, and taxi business operators as subsidized business operators, and promoted the business of installing the integrated call center and introducing the call taxi system (hereinafter referred to as “instant business”).

The project of this case was implemented with the subsidy of 70% from HH, and the remaining 30% was paid from the taxi engineer or taxi company. The Defendants conspired in collusion during the project of this case to inflict damages on the Plaintiffs or the commission of this case by unlawful acts as follows, and thus, they should compensate the Defendants for the damages.

In the case of Defendant A, Article 65 of the Civil Act may apply mutatis mutandis to such an act of breach of trust, thereby bearing liability for damages.

The Defendants, while participating in the tendering procedure for the instant project, selected the Defendant Company as the contractor and subsequently subsequently selected the contract amount of KRW 471,100,60,600, which was lower than that of the Defendant Company, by omitting the prices for certain items in the instant project, and excluded the Defendant Company J (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) which bided KRW 441,843,60, which was lower than that of the Defendant Company.

On the calculation sheet of the required amount submitted by the defendant company, it is to exclude some items and set the amount of 406,60,600 won as the bid amount.

arrow