logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2015.04.09 2014고정1699
재물손괴
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On March 13, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was parked in a resident parking area of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul at a time, for a vehicle owned by the victim E E (E) in front of the damaged vehicle; (b) was extremely small on the ground that the text of the phone number does not seem too small; and (c) caused the damage to the victim by making a multiple parts of the front offender and front part of the damaged vehicle in front of the damaged vehicle in hand; and (d) damaged the vehicle to have an estimated repair cost of KRW 1,320,00

2. Determination

A. The Defendant sought access to the instant damaged vehicle and sought contact points from this Court, and in the process, contacted the damaged vehicle with the hand floor, but asserts that the vehicle did not have been damaged, such as as indicated in the facts charged.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances revealed in the records of the instant case, it cannot be ruled out that a third party, other than the Defendant, was likely to destroy a damaged vehicle, and the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone cannot be deemed as having proved the facts charged of the instant case without reasonable doubt

1) The victim D confirmed the black box installed within the damaged vehicle in the investigative agency, and prepared a statement that there is a female voice to be reported along with the sound at the price of the damaged vehicle, which is marked by the person from the F SM5 vehicle. However, D, at the time of the damage in this court, when confirming the black box image, the defendant sent a face to the parking controller on the side of the vehicle, and the victim stated that he was a male, and that he was almost at the same time that he was a male, and that he was a male, and that the sound at the time when the defendant was able to get off the damaged vehicle and the damaged vehicle were almost at the same time. (ii) According to the black image, the defendant was parked in the F SM5 vehicle on March 21, 2014 by driving the FSM5 vehicle on the front of the damaged vehicle, and immediately after confirming the number and telephone number of the damaged vehicle on the vehicle, it appears that the damaged vehicle was at the front of the damaged vehicle on March 13, 2014.

arrow