Text
The Defendant’s KRW 92,500,000 among the Plaintiff and KRW 30,000,000 among the Plaintiff, shall be from May 16, 2013 to September 5, 2014, and 62,500.
Reasons
1. Determination on claims related to the good offices
A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) around August 6, 2009, the defendant alleged that he invested in the plaintiff's business of Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno Complex D Co., Ltd., and that 20 million won should be operated at the above D construction site, and the plaintiff should be employed in charge of material management at the above D construction site. The plaintiff trusted that 20 million won should be paid to the non-party E on August 8, 2009 at the defendant's request, and that 20 million won should be provided to the plaintiff on September 31, 2009, 50,000 won to the defendant or 30 million won should be provided to the defendant on September 6, 2009, 200 won to the plaintiff on September 5, 200, 2000 won, or 300,000 won should be provided to the defendant on September 7, 2009, 201.
On the other hand, the remaining money paid by the plaintiff to the defendant is invested in the expectation that if the defendant's business is smoothly carried out, it will be able to operate a house at the construction site.
Therefore, the defendant did not deceiving the plaintiff.
B. Judgment 1) Evidence Nos. 1, 2, 19, 21, and 22 of the Judgment on KRW 20 million paid on August 8, 2009 (including a serial number if any; hereinafter the same shall apply in the absence of any special reference
In full view of each statement in Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 3, the defendant invested in the execution business of the above D main apartment around August 6, 2009.