The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court is justifiable to have determined that the lower court convicted all of the charges of violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Indecent Acts by force against minors under the age of 13) among the charges in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning, and it did not err by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules

In addition, in full consideration of all the circumstances indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, occupation, type of crime, motive, criminal process, result, etc., it is justifiable for the lower court to maintain the first instance judgment that sentenced the disclosure order and notification order for a period of three years on the ground that the lower court did not have any special reason to not disclose the Defendant’s personal information even if considering the circumstances asserted by the national defense counsel. In so doing, the lower court did not err

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.