1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 3 and 4 may be admitted by integrating the whole purport of the pleadings:

The plaintiff is the importing and selling company of alcoholic beverages, and the defendant is the selling company of alcoholic beverages.

B. Around 2012, the Plaintiff and the Defendant continued to supply alcoholic beverages to the Defendant, and the Defendant, as a matter of principle, made a supply contract for alcoholic beverages to the effect that the Plaintiff may pay alcoholic beverages in cash whenever supplied alcoholic beverages. However, in the event that the Plaintiff recognizes, the Plaintiff entered into a supply contract for alcoholic beverages to the effect that the said payment may be made by securities and other settlement methods (

C. The Plaintiff supplied alcoholic beverages to the Defendant from around 2012 to the end of December 2014 according to the instant supply contract.

Meanwhile, the representative director or the representative director of the defendant was employed from January 17, 201 to January 17, 2014; from August 8, 2013 to January 15, 2015; D from January 15, 2015 to February 12, 2015; E from January 15, 2015 to April 29, 2015; and F from February 13, 2015 to April 29, 2015.

The date of appointment, retirement, dismissal, and resignation stated in the defendant's certificate of registration was based.

2. Judgment on the parties' arguments

A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings as to the cause of the claim Gap's evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and Gap evidence Nos. 6-1 through 5, the facts can be acknowledged that the plaintiff supplied alcoholic beverages to the defendant from December 1, 2014 to December 29, 2014 (hereinafter "the supply of alcoholic beverages in this case") but the defendant did not receive 20,958,938 won from the supply of the alcoholic beverages in this case. Thus, barring any other special circumstances, the defendant is clear that the defendant served the defendant with a copy of the complaint in this case from January 1, 2015 to December 29, 2014, as sought by the plaintiff.