A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On August 31, 201, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million by the Suwon District Court due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). The Defendant had two previous criminal records of the same kind including the issuance of a summary order of KRW 5 million.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) is a person engaged in driving B;

On May 1, 2020, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 12:35, and moved the front intersection of D in the wife population C from the E side to the Jincheon-do.

Since the center line is installed, and the passage of motor vehicles is frequent, in such a case, the driver of the motor vehicle has the duty of care to observe the center line and to safely drive the motor vehicle by checking well the right and the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant repeated the same horses under the influence of alcohol such as blood alcohol level of 0.235%, and neglected to drive normally due to the influence of alcohol such as a string distance, which led to the Defendant’s failure to drive in a state where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of alcohol, and caused the Plaintiff’s H (60 years old) driver’s failure to walk back the center line from the G room to the G room on the part of the Defendant’s driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury on the left side of the victim in need of approximately two weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

2. Around May 1, 2020, the Defendant was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately 12 km from the J of the wife population to the place indicated in the preceding port, which was under the influence of alcohol by 0.235%.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A H statement;

1. A medical certificate;

1. The report on traffic accidents (the actual survey report);