beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant is a person who drives a multi-user car in violation of the Road Traffic Act.
On February 9, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3.5 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) at the source of a horizontal housing site on February 9, 2010, and a fine of KRW 1 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) at the source of a horizontal housing site on May 24, 2013.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol content of around 23:40 on April 1, 2016, is under the influence of alcohol content of 0.122% on the blood, left the direction of the same Eup/Myeon on the roads of Seo-si in Pyeongtaek-si.
7. Until the front of the cafeteria cafeteria, the driver was driving approximately 200 meters of the vehicle he owns.
2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a person who drives a multi-user car.
No one shall operate a motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance on the road, but the defendant shall operate on April 1, 2016, along with the same Eup/Myeon from the road of Pyeongtaek-si in Pyeongtaek-si in Pyeongtaek-si on April 1, 2016.
7. Until the day before the cafeteria, a driver was driving approximately 200 meters of the vehicle he owns, without mandatory insurance.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;
1. Inquiry into mandatory insurance;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;
1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, and the selection of fines;
1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;
1. The main sentence of Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which bears the costs of lawsuit;