logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.12.20 2018나33532
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff and C are legally married couple who completed the marriage report on August 19, 1987, and have two children.

B. Since around 2007, the Defendant and C sent a close relation after becoming aware of each other. On or around February 2007, the Plaintiff’s temporary appointment or the temporary appointment of the Defendant’s assertion on or around February 2008. Around that time, the Plaintiff and C’s house were left in the house of the Plaintiff and C, and the Defendant returned to the house of the Plaintiff was found to have been witnessed by the Plaintiff and his father.

C. On May 4, 2016, the Defendant, along with C, had a variety of trips, such as Black Do trip around May 4, 2016, and Jeju-do trip on May 28, 2016.

C had the Defendant’s wife as “Korea’s personal affairs,” and had the Defendant’s wife named “Korea’s personal affairs,” and also had the Defendant’s wife named “Korea’s personal affairs.”

E. On October 31, 2017, C filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff for divorce, etc. with Seoul Family Court 2017Dhap38624 (the Seoul Family Court 2017Ddan337829). On June 27, 2018, the above court rendered a judgment dismissing C’s claim for divorce, etc. on the ground that “The main liability arising from the Plaintiff’s mistake alleged by C is not only lack of evidence to acknowledge the grounds for divorce, but also exists on the ground that C and the Plaintiff had a long-term illegal relationship with the Defendant, and thus, C’s claim for divorce, a responsible spouse, is without merit.” The above judgment became final and conclusive as is.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there has been no dispute, each entry and video of Gap's 1 through 14 (including branch numbers, if any) and the purport of whole pleadings

2. Determination

(a) A third party who has a liability for damages shall not interfere with a married couple’s communal living falling under the nature of marriage, such as interfering with a married couple’s communal living by interfering with another person’s communal living;

The essence of marriage is the third party by committing a fraudulent act with either side of the married couple.

arrow