Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Around November 9, 2019, the Defendant assaulted the victim, such as, under the influence of alcohol, the victim E (58 years of age) who was running a D taxi vehicle in the direction of the road, brea-gu C, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, and the victim E (58 years of age) who was running a D taxi vehicle in the direction of the road. The victim’s boomed the rest of the said cab vehicle, opened the window, and boomed the Defendant’s resistance, thereby gathering the damages from the said cab vehicle, and cutting off the victim’s kis and additionally falling off the victim’s kis by shabing the victim’s kis by dibing the bat with the window.
2. On November 9, 2019, around 03:35, the Defendant was asked about the instant case from the police officer H who belongs to the Busan Southern Police Station G District G District District in Busan, who was dispatched to the site after receiving the report of 112 on November 9, 2019, and the Defendant was asked about the instant case. On one occasion, the Defendant was asked about the face and breast side of H with the right drinking.
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case by police officers H.
3. When the Defendant was at the time and place set forth in paragraph (2) and at the time and place of the police officer’s disturbance, and the Defendant was forced to restrain the disturbance from H, the Defendant: (a) plucked and plucked the I patrol vehicle’s electric antenna, which was stopped at that place by hand, and was arrested by the police officer in flagrante of obstruction of performance of official duties; (b) refused to board the patrol vehicle as a flagrant offender of obstruction of performance of official duties; and (c) destroyed by the two hand the booms set up at the rear seat window of the J patrol.
Accordingly, the defendant has impaired the utility of the non-electric antenna and ship base, which is a public object, by impairing their repair costs.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The police statement of E and H;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph damaged parts of the crime, and photographs of damaged public objects;
1. Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of view of damage to goods for public use) and Article 136 of the selection of applicable law to facts constituting an offense;